7 Best Google Analytics 4 Attribution Alternatives for 2026

· 13 min read

GA4 removed first-click, linear, time-decay, and position-based models in 2023—leaving only Data-Driven Attribution (a black box requiring 400+ conversions that favors Google channels). mbuzz gives you 8 models + custom rules at $29-299/mo. HockeyStack and Dreamdata handle B2B attribution. Cometly and Triple Whale optimize paid ads. Most teams should keep GA4 for web analytics and add a dedicated attribution layer alongside it.

The Real Question

GA4 removed first-click, linear, time-decay, and position-based models in 2023. You're stuck with Data-Driven Attribution—a black box that requires 400+ conversions and favors Google channels. You're here because you want to see attribution from multiple angles, not trust one algorithm.

Quick Answer

Want model flexibility? GA4 gives you one model. You want eight.
mbuzz — 8 models + custom rules, server-side tracking, $29-299/mo

Need LTV attribution? GA4 attributes to first purchase only.
mbuzz — tracks every renewal, upsell, and expansion back to source

B2B with long sales cycles? GA4 doesn't understand 6-month buying journeys.
mbuzz for server-side accuracy + model flexibility, HockeyStack for all-in-one, Dreamdata for journey visualization

AI-powered ad optimization? You want channel-level recommendations.
Cometly or Triple Whale

Full measurement stack (MTA + MMM)? GA4 can't do media mix modeling.
Northbeam or Rockerbox (note: MMM requires $5M+ annual ad spend to be statistically valid)

The Uncomfortable Truth

GA4 is free and ubiquitous—that's its superpower. Most teams don't need to replace GA4 entirely. They need to add a dedicated attribution layer alongside it. GA4 remains great for traffic analysis, user behavior, and Google Ads integration. What it can't do anymore is tell you how your non-Google channels actually contribute.

The deeper issue: GA4's single remaining model (DDA) requires 400+ conversions to even activate. If you're a smaller brand or have lower traffic, you're stuck with last-click fallback. And even when DDA kicks in, independent analyses consistently show it favors Google properties.

If GA4 is your only analytics tool and you have basic attribution needs, it's still the best free option. This guide is for teams who need to see the full picture.

Common Reasons to Switch

Limitation Impact
Only 1 attribution model remaining Can't compare models or validate what DDA tells you
400+ conversion minimum Smaller brands stuck with last-click fallback
Google channel bias Non-Google channels (social, email, direct) get undervalued
Data sampling at scale High-traffic sites get sampled data, not actuals
Client-side only Ad blockers drop 30-40% of visitor data

If any of these resonate, here are your best options.

Interactive Demo

See mbuzz in action

Explore 8 attribution models with sample data — no signup needed

Try Demo

Find Your GA4 Attribution Alternative

Price:
Market:
Features:
Setup time:
12 tools
Tool Best For Starting Price Key Features
mbuzz logo
mbuzz
Server-side attribution with model flexibility
Free
Custom models Server-side LTV
Try Free →
Triple Whale logo
Triple Whale
Shopify-native attribution
Shopify stores, Easy setup
$129/mo
3 models
Alternatives →
Northbeam logo
Northbeam
ML-powered DTC attribution
Enterprise DTC ($40M+), Dedicated media buyers
$400/mo
View-through 1 model
Alternatives →
HockeyStack logo
HockeyStack
All-in-one B2B attribution
B2B SaaS, Series A-C
$2200/mo
View-through 3 models
Alternatives →
Dreamdata logo
Dreamdata
B2B revenue attribution
B2B mid-market, Journey visualization
$999/mo (free tier)
View-through Journey viz 3 models
Alternatives →
Rockerbox logo
Rockerbox
Multi-channel attribution with MMM
Multi-channel brands, Podcast/TV advertisers
$200/mo (free tier)
View-through MMM 3 models
Alternatives →
Ruler Analytics logo
Ruler Analytics
Call tracking + attribution
Lead gen businesses, Call-heavy industries
£349/mo
Calls 3 models
Alternatives →
Hyros logo
Hyros
High-ticket attribution
High-ticket sales, Info products
$500/mo
LTV 3 models
Alternatives →
Bizible (Adobe) logo
Bizible (Adobe)
Enterprise Salesforce attribution
Enterprise B2B, Salesforce-heavy orgs
Custom
View-through 5 models
Lifesight logo
Lifesight
Unified measurement platform
Enterprise brands, Full measurement stack
Custom
LTV View-through MMM
Cometly logo
Cometly
AI-powered ad attribution
E-commerce/DTC paid ads, Meta & Google optimization
$199/mo
4 models
Alternatives →
Google Analytics 4 logo
Google Analytics 4
Free web analytics
Getting started, Budget zero
Free
2 models

Mbuzz logo

1. Mbuzz — Best for Model Flexibility

Why consider mbuzz: GA4 gives you one attribution model. mbuzz gives you 8 built-in models plus custom rules—so you can compare how credit shifts between channels under different assumptions.

What mbuzz Offers

Server-side tracking that ad blockers can't touch. GA4 relies on client-side JavaScript that gets blocked by 30-40% of browsers. mbuzz tracks events on your backend—capturing 95%+ of customer journeys, including the ones GA4 never sees.

8 attribution models, not 1. Compare first-touch, last-touch, linear, time-decay, U-shaped, W-shaped, plus data-driven Markov Chain and Shapley Value models side-by-side. See how credit shifts between channels under different models—the exact capability GA4 removed:

Attribution Model Comparison

Demo Data

Linear

Conversions

2,382

Revenue

$147,230

Credit by Channel

Paid Search
28%
Organic
24%
Email
19%
Paid Social
17%
Direct
12%

Markov Chain

Conversions

2,382

Revenue

$147,230

Credit by Channel

Paid Search
22%
Organic
31%
Email
14%
Paid Social
21%
Direct
12%

Notice: Markov Chain credits Organic +7% more than Linear. Same data, different truth.

Custom attribution rules via rule editor. GA4 never had this. Build your own attribution logic—weight touchpoints by channel, stage, or recency:

Custom Time-Decay Attribution
Rule Editor
within_window 90.days do
  within_window 30.days, weight: 0.6 do
    time_decay half_life: 7.days
  end

  within_window 30.days..60.days, weight: 0.4 do
    time_decay half_life: 14.days
  end
end

Build custom attribution rules in minutes. Weight channels, apply time-decay, define your own logic.

No minimum conversion threshold. GA4's DDA requires 400+ conversions to activate. mbuzz runs all 8 models from day one, regardless of traffic volume.

LTV attribution for recurring revenue. GA4 attributes to first purchase only. mbuzz tracks every renewal, upsell, and expansion back to the original acquisition source—critical for SaaS and subscription businesses.

Conversions Funnel Events
30d First Touch
Conversions
2,847 +12%
Revenue
$284K +19%
AOV
$100 +6%
Avg Days
4.2
Channels
2.8
Visits
5.3

Performance

Paid Email Organic

By Channel

Paid
$142K
Email
$71K
Organic
$43K
Direct
$21K

Real-time attribution • Compare models • Export anytime

Transparent pricing, complement to GA4:

Tier Records/Month Price
Free Up to 30K $0
Starter Up to 1M $29/mo
Growth Up to 5M $99/mo
Pro Up to 25M $299/mo

10-minute setup with native SDKs for Rails, Django, Laravel, and Node.jssetup guide. Runs alongside GA4—no need to replace anything.

mbuzz vs GA4

Factor GA4 mbuzz
Attribution models 1 (DDA only) 8 + custom rules
Custom models ✗ No ✓ Yes (rule editor)
Tracking method Client-side Server-side
Platform bias Favors Google channels None
Minimum conversions 400+ for DDA None
Data sampling Yes (at scale) No
LTV attribution ✗ No ✓ Yes
Price Free Free / $29-299/mo

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • 8 attribution models vs GA4's single remaining model
  • Server-side tracking captures what GA4 misses
  • No platform bias—every channel measured equally
  • Custom rules for your own attribution logic
  • No minimum conversion threshold

Cons

  • Not free (GA4's biggest advantage)
  • Requires SDK integration, not a tag drop-in
  • No built-in web analytics—you still need GA4 for that

Who mbuzz is NOT For

Let's be honest—mbuzz isn't right for everyone:

Best For

See what GA4's black box hides

Compare 8 attribution models side-by-side. See how credit shifts when you change the model. Start free.

Try mbuzz Free →

Hockeystack logo

2. Hockeystack — Best All-in-One for B2B

Why consider HockeyStack: Replaces GA4 entirely for B2B teams—bundles attribution, web analytics, and surveys in one platform.

HockeyStack vs GA4

Factor GA4 HockeyStack
Price Free $2,200+/mo
Attribution models 1 (DDA) 3
Web analytics ✓ Full ✓ Bundled
B2B features ✗ None ✓ Account-level
Surveys ✗ No ✓ Built-in
Long sales cycles ✗ Limited ✓ Designed for

Why HockeyStack Over GA4

For B2B SaaS teams, GA4 fundamentally doesn't understand your buying process. 6-month sales cycles, multiple stakeholders, account-level attribution—GA4 treats each visitor as an individual, not part of a buying committee.

HockeyStack replaces GA4's analytics entirely and adds B2B-specific attribution that GA4 can't do.

Best For

Also consider: HockeyStack alternatives for more B2B options at lower price points.


Dreamdata logo

3. Dreamdata — Best for B2B on a Budget

Why consider Dreamdata: B2B attribution with a free tier—the GA4-to-paid-attribution bridge for budget-conscious teams.

Dreamdata vs GA4

Factor GA4 Dreamdata
Price Free Free / $999/mo
B2B-specific ✗ No ✓ Yes
Journey visualization Basic Excellent
CRM integration Manual ✓ Native
LinkedIn tracking ✗ No ✓ Deep
Setup time Hours 4-8 weeks

Why Dreamdata Over GA4

Dreamdata's free tier gives you B2B-specific attribution that GA4 doesn't offer—journey visualization, CRM integration, and account-level tracking. If you're outgrowing GA4 for attribution but not ready for $2,200/mo HockeyStack, Dreamdata bridges the gap.

Best For

Also consider: Dreamdata alternatives for other mid-market B2B options.


Cometly logo

4. Cometly — Best for Paid Ad Optimization

Why consider Cometly: Where GA4 undervalues non-Google channels, Cometly excels at optimizing Meta and Google ad performance through CAPI enrichment.

Cometly vs GA4

Factor GA4 Cometly
Price Free ~$199-5,000/mo
Channel coverage All (biased) Paid ads only
CAPI enrichment ✗ No ✓ Native
AI recommendations ✗ No ✓ Yes
Platform bias Google-favoring Ad platform-aligned
Pricing transparency Free Must schedule demo

Why Cometly Over GA4

GA4 undervalues Meta, TikTok, and non-Google paid channels. Cometly's CAPI enrichment improves Meta match rates from 4.5 to 9.4, giving you much more accurate ad platform data. If paid ads are your primary channel, Cometly tells you more than GA4 can.

Best For


Triple Whale logo

5. Triple Whale — Best for Shopify Stores

Why consider Triple Whale: Dead-simple Shopify attribution that replaces GA4's e-commerce tracking.

Triple Whale vs GA4

Factor GA4 Triple Whale
Price Free $129-279/mo
Shopify integration Good Native (app)
Setup Moderate Minutes
AI assistant ✗ No ✓ Moby AI
E-commerce focus General Purpose-built
Platform support Any Shopify only

Why Triple Whale Over GA4

For Shopify stores, GA4's e-commerce tracking is clunky to configure and generic. Triple Whale installs as a Shopify app in minutes and gives you Shopify-specific attribution, profit tracking, and an AI assistant (Moby) for natural-language data queries.

Best For

Also consider: Triple Whale alternatives if you need multi-platform support.


Northbeam logo

6. Northbeam — Best for Enterprise DTC

Why consider Northbeam: ML-powered attribution that prevents the overcounting GA4 can't solve.

Northbeam vs GA4

Factor GA4 Northbeam
Price Free $400+/mo
Attribution approach DDA (black box) ML fractional
Overcounting prevention ✗ No ✓ Sums to 100%
Creative analytics ✗ No ✓ Yes
MMM capability ✗ No ✓ Higher tiers
Ad platform partnerships Google only Meta, TikTok, Snap, Pinterest

Why Northbeam Over GA4

GA4 and ad platforms together often claim 190 conversions for 100 actual sales. Northbeam assigns fractional ML credit that sums to exactly 100, solving the overcounting problem that GA4 can't address.

Best For

Also consider: Northbeam alternatives for other enterprise DTC options.


Rockerbox logo

7. Rockerbox — Best for Multi-Channel + MMM

Why consider Rockerbox: GA4 can't measure podcasts, TV, or direct mail. Rockerbox can.

Rockerbox vs GA4

Factor GA4 Rockerbox
Price Free $200/mo (free tier)
Podcast tracking ✗ No ✓ Yes
TV/CTV tracking ✗ No ✓ Yes
Direct mail ✗ No ✓ Yes
MMM included ✗ No ✓ Yes
Digital attribution ✓ (limited) ✓ Yes

Why Rockerbox Over GA4

If you invest in awareness channels—podcasts, connected TV, influencer partnerships—GA4 shows you nothing. Rockerbox measures these difficult-to-attribute channels with proxy tracking, surveys, and media mix modeling.

Best For

Also consider: Rockerbox alternatives for other multi-channel options.


How to Choose: Decision Framework

By Budget

Monthly Budget Best Options
Free Stick with GA4 + supplement later
Under $300 mbuzz ($29-299/mo)
$300-1,000 Dreamdata ($999/mo), Cometly
$1,000+ HockeyStack ($2,200+/mo), Northbeam ($400+/mo)

By Use Case

If You Need... Best Alternative
Multiple attribution models mbuzz (8 models + custom)
LTV / recurring revenue attribution mbuzz (tracks renewals + upsells to source)
Server-side tracking (no ad blocker gaps) mbuzz (95%+ event capture)
B2B SaaS attribution mbuzz, HockeyStack, Dreamdata
E-commerce/DTC attribution mbuzz, Triple Whale, Cometly, Northbeam
Multi-channel including offline Rockerbox
Model transparency + custom rules mbuzz
Unbiased channel measurement mbuzz, Northbeam

By Technical Depth

Technical Level Best Fit
Non-technical Triple Whale, Cometly
Marketing ops Dreamdata, HockeyStack
Technical marketers mbuzz, Northbeam
Enterprise data teams Northbeam, Rockerbox

Summary: Best GA4 Attribution Alternatives

Alternative Primary Strength Starting Price
mbuzz 8 models + custom rules, no bias Free tier, $29-299/mo
HockeyStack All-in-one B2B replacement $2,200+/mo
Dreamdata B2B with free tier Free / $999/mo
Cometly Paid ad CAPI enrichment ~$199/mo
Triple Whale Shopify-native simplicity $129-279/mo
Northbeam ML-powered, no overcounting $400+/mo
Rockerbox Podcast/TV/multi-channel + MMM $200/mo (free tier)

The bottom line: GA4 is great for web analytics—keep it for that. But GA4's attribution is now a single black-box model that favors Google channels and requires 400+ conversions. If attribution matters to your business, add a dedicated tool alongside GA4.

GA4 removed 5 attribution models. We added 8.

Compare First Touch, Last Touch, Linear, Time Decay, U-Shaped, W-Shaped, Markov Chain, and Shapley Value—side by side. Start free.

Try mbuzz Free →

Key Takeaways

  • GA4 removed first-click, linear, time-decay, and position-based models in 2023—only Data-Driven Attribution remains
  • GA4's Data-Driven Attribution requires 400+ conversions and favors Google channels
  • Most teams should keep GA4 for web analytics and add a dedicated attribution layer
  • Server-side tracking captures 30-40% more data than GA4's client-side approach
  • Alternatives range from $29/mo (mbuzz) to $2,200+/mo (HockeyStack) depending on needs
Why look for GA4 attribution alternatives?
GA4 removed first-click, linear, time-decay, and position-based attribution models in 2023. You're now limited to Data-Driven Attribution—a black box that requires 400+ conversions and has documented bias toward Google channels. If you want to compare models or see non-Google channels fairly, you need a dedicated tool.
Should I replace GA4 entirely?
No. GA4 is still excellent for web analytics, traffic analysis, and Google Ads integration. Most teams should keep GA4 for those purposes and add a dedicated attribution tool alongside it. They're complementary, not replacements.
What's the cheapest GA4 attribution alternative?
mbuzz offers a free tier with 8 attribution models and custom rules. Paid plans start at $29/mo. Dreamdata also has a free tier for individuals. For pure attribution needs, these are the most affordable starting points.
Which GA4 alternative is best for B2B?
HockeyStack ($2,200+/mo) for all-in-one B2B analytics, Dreamdata ($999/mo) for journey visualization on a budget, or mbuzz ($29-299/mo) for model flexibility and server-side tracking. Choice depends on budget and whether you need bundled analytics.
Does GA4's Data-Driven Attribution actually favor Google channels?
Yes, documented analyses show GA4's DDA model tends to give more credit to Google properties (Ads, organic search) compared to non-Google channels. This isn't necessarily intentional—the model is trained on Google's data and optimizes for conversions it can measure most accurately.
Holly Henderson
Holly Henderson

Co-Founder, mbuzz

Holly Henderson is Co-Founder of mbuzz. With 10+ years in marketing including roles at Westpac, Avon, and Forebrite, she's obsessed with making measurement actually useful.

Harvard Extension School Forebrite Westpac Avon

Ready to try it?

Set up server-side attribution in 10 minutes. Free up to 30K records/month.