7 Best Google Analytics 4 Attribution Alternatives for 2026
GA4 removed first-click, linear, time-decay, and position-based models in 2023—leaving only Data-Driven Attribution (a black box requiring 400+ conversions that favors Google channels). mbuzz gives you 8 models + custom rules at $29-299/mo. HockeyStack and Dreamdata handle B2B attribution. Cometly and Triple Whale optimize paid ads. Most teams should keep GA4 for web analytics and add a dedicated attribution layer alongside it.
The Real Question
GA4 removed first-click, linear, time-decay, and position-based models in 2023. You're stuck with Data-Driven Attribution—a black box that requires 400+ conversions and favors Google channels. You're here because you want to see attribution from multiple angles, not trust one algorithm.
Quick Answer
Want model flexibility? GA4 gives you one model. You want eight.
→ mbuzz — 8 models + custom rules, server-side tracking, $29-299/mo
Need LTV attribution? GA4 attributes to first purchase only.
→ mbuzz — tracks every renewal, upsell, and expansion back to source
B2B with long sales cycles? GA4 doesn't understand 6-month buying journeys.
→ mbuzz for server-side accuracy + model flexibility, HockeyStack for all-in-one, Dreamdata for journey visualization
AI-powered ad optimization? You want channel-level recommendations.
→ Cometly or Triple Whale
Full measurement stack (MTA + MMM)? GA4 can't do media mix modeling.
→ Northbeam or Rockerbox (note: MMM requires $5M+ annual ad spend to be statistically valid)
The Uncomfortable Truth
GA4 is free and ubiquitous—that's its superpower. Most teams don't need to replace GA4 entirely. They need to add a dedicated attribution layer alongside it. GA4 remains great for traffic analysis, user behavior, and Google Ads integration. What it can't do anymore is tell you how your non-Google channels actually contribute.
The deeper issue: GA4's single remaining model (DDA) requires 400+ conversions to even activate. If you're a smaller brand or have lower traffic, you're stuck with last-click fallback. And even when DDA kicks in, independent analyses consistently show it favors Google properties.
If GA4 is your only analytics tool and you have basic attribution needs, it's still the best free option. This guide is for teams who need to see the full picture.
Common Reasons to Switch
| Limitation | Impact |
|---|---|
| Only 1 attribution model remaining | Can't compare models or validate what DDA tells you |
| 400+ conversion minimum | Smaller brands stuck with last-click fallback |
| Google channel bias | Non-Google channels (social, email, direct) get undervalued |
| Data sampling at scale | High-traffic sites get sampled data, not actuals |
| Client-side only | Ad blockers drop 30-40% of visitor data |
If any of these resonate, here are your best options.
See mbuzz in action
Explore 8 attribution models with sample data — no signup needed
Find Your GA4 Attribution Alternative
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Key Features | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
mbuzz
Server-side attribution with model flexibility
|
|
Free |
Custom models
Server-side
LTV
|
Try Free → |
Triple Whale
Shopify-native attribution
|
Shopify stores, Easy setup
|
$129/mo |
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Northbeam
ML-powered DTC attribution
|
Enterprise DTC ($40M+), Dedicated media buyers
|
$400/mo |
View-through
1 model
|
Alternatives → |
HockeyStack
All-in-one B2B attribution
|
B2B SaaS, Series A-C
|
$2200/mo |
View-through
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Dreamdata
B2B revenue attribution
|
B2B mid-market, Journey visualization
|
$999/mo (free tier) |
View-through
Journey viz
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Rockerbox
Multi-channel attribution with MMM
|
Multi-channel brands, Podcast/TV advertisers
|
$200/mo (free tier) |
View-through
MMM
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Ruler Analytics
Call tracking + attribution
|
Lead gen businesses, Call-heavy industries
|
£349/mo |
Calls
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Hyros
High-ticket attribution
|
High-ticket sales, Info products
|
$500/mo |
LTV
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Bizible (Adobe)
Enterprise Salesforce attribution
|
Enterprise B2B, Salesforce-heavy orgs
|
Custom |
View-through
5 models
|
|
Lifesight
Unified measurement platform
|
Enterprise brands, Full measurement stack
|
Custom |
LTV
View-through
MMM
|
|
Cometly
AI-powered ad attribution
|
E-commerce/DTC paid ads, Meta & Google optimization
|
$199/mo |
4 models
|
Alternatives → |
Google Analytics 4
Free web analytics
|
Getting started, Budget zero
|
Free |
2 models
|
No tools match your filters
Try adjusting your criteria or
1. Mbuzz — Best for Model Flexibility
Why consider mbuzz: GA4 gives you one attribution model. mbuzz gives you 8 built-in models plus custom rules—so you can compare how credit shifts between channels under different assumptions.
What mbuzz Offers
Server-side tracking that ad blockers can't touch. GA4 relies on client-side JavaScript that gets blocked by 30-40% of browsers. mbuzz tracks events on your backend—capturing 95%+ of customer journeys, including the ones GA4 never sees.
8 attribution models, not 1. Compare first-touch, last-touch, linear, time-decay, U-shaped, W-shaped, plus data-driven Markov Chain and Shapley Value models side-by-side. See how credit shifts between channels under different models—the exact capability GA4 removed:
Attribution Model Comparison
Demo DataLinear
Conversions
2,382
Revenue
$147,230
Credit by Channel
Markov Chain
Conversions
2,382
Revenue
$147,230
Credit by Channel
Notice: Markov Chain credits Organic +7% more than Linear. Same data, different truth.
Custom attribution rules via rule editor. GA4 never had this. Build your own attribution logic—weight touchpoints by channel, stage, or recency:
within_window 90.days do
within_window 30.days, weight: 0.6 do
time_decay half_life: 7.days
end
within_window 30.days..60.days, weight: 0.4 do
time_decay half_life: 14.days
end
end
Build custom attribution rules in minutes. Weight channels, apply time-decay, define your own logic.
No minimum conversion threshold. GA4's DDA requires 400+ conversions to activate. mbuzz runs all 8 models from day one, regardless of traffic volume.
LTV attribution for recurring revenue. GA4 attributes to first purchase only. mbuzz tracks every renewal, upsell, and expansion back to the original acquisition source—critical for SaaS and subscription businesses.
Performance
By Channel
Real-time attribution • Compare models • Export anytime
Transparent pricing, complement to GA4:
| Tier | Records/Month | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Up to 30K | $0 |
| Starter | Up to 1M | $29/mo |
| Growth | Up to 5M | $99/mo |
| Pro | Up to 25M | $299/mo |
10-minute setup with native SDKs for Rails, Django, Laravel, and Node.js — setup guide. Runs alongside GA4—no need to replace anything.
mbuzz vs GA4
| Factor | GA4 | mbuzz |
|---|---|---|
| Attribution models | 1 (DDA only) | 8 + custom rules |
| Custom models | ✗ No | ✓ Yes (rule editor) |
| Tracking method | Client-side | Server-side |
| Platform bias | Favors Google channels | None |
| Minimum conversions | 400+ for DDA | None |
| Data sampling | Yes (at scale) | No |
| LTV attribution | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Price | Free | Free / $29-299/mo |
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 8 attribution models vs GA4's single remaining model
- Server-side tracking captures what GA4 misses
- No platform bias—every channel measured equally
- Custom rules for your own attribution logic
- No minimum conversion threshold
Cons
- Not free (GA4's biggest advantage)
- Requires SDK integration, not a tag drop-in
- No built-in web analytics—you still need GA4 for that
Who mbuzz is NOT For
Let's be honest—mbuzz isn't right for everyone:
- Teams with zero budget — GA4 is free; mbuzz's free tier is limited
- Teams who only need web analytics — GA4 is better for traffic analysis and behavior flow
- Heavy Google Ads spenders happy with DDA — If you trust Google's model and it works, keep it
Best For
- Teams who want to compare multiple attribution models
- Companies where non-Google channels are significant revenue drivers
- Those frustrated with GA4's data sampling at scale
- Server-side tracking needs (ad blocker mitigation)
See what GA4's black box hides
Compare 8 attribution models side-by-side. See how credit shifts when you change the model. Start free.
Try mbuzz Free →
2. Hockeystack — Best All-in-One for B2B
Why consider HockeyStack: Replaces GA4 entirely for B2B teams—bundles attribution, web analytics, and surveys in one platform.
HockeyStack vs GA4
| Factor | GA4 | HockeyStack |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | $2,200+/mo |
| Attribution models | 1 (DDA) | 3 |
| Web analytics | ✓ Full | ✓ Bundled |
| B2B features | ✗ None | ✓ Account-level |
| Surveys | ✗ No | ✓ Built-in |
| Long sales cycles | ✗ Limited | ✓ Designed for |
Why HockeyStack Over GA4
For B2B SaaS teams, GA4 fundamentally doesn't understand your buying process. 6-month sales cycles, multiple stakeholders, account-level attribution—GA4 treats each visitor as an individual, not part of a buying committee.
HockeyStack replaces GA4's analytics entirely and adds B2B-specific attribution that GA4 can't do.
Best For
- B2B SaaS teams (Series A-C) with $2,200+/mo budget
- Teams wanting to replace GA4 entirely, not supplement it
- Account-based attribution needs
- Fast deployment (~2 weeks)
Also consider: HockeyStack alternatives for more B2B options at lower price points.
3. Dreamdata — Best for B2B on a Budget
Why consider Dreamdata: B2B attribution with a free tier—the GA4-to-paid-attribution bridge for budget-conscious teams.
Dreamdata vs GA4
| Factor | GA4 | Dreamdata |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free / $999/mo |
| B2B-specific | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Journey visualization | Basic | Excellent |
| CRM integration | Manual | ✓ Native |
| LinkedIn tracking | ✗ No | ✓ Deep |
| Setup time | Hours | 4-8 weeks |
Why Dreamdata Over GA4
Dreamdata's free tier gives you B2B-specific attribution that GA4 doesn't offer—journey visualization, CRM integration, and account-level tracking. If you're outgrowing GA4 for attribution but not ready for $2,200/mo HockeyStack, Dreamdata bridges the gap.
Best For
- B2B teams transitioning from GA4-only
- Budget-conscious teams wanting a free tier
- Journey visualization as a priority
- LinkedIn-heavy marketing teams
Also consider: Dreamdata alternatives for other mid-market B2B options.
4. Cometly — Best for Paid Ad Optimization
Why consider Cometly: Where GA4 undervalues non-Google channels, Cometly excels at optimizing Meta and Google ad performance through CAPI enrichment.
Cometly vs GA4
| Factor | GA4 | Cometly |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | ~$199-5,000/mo |
| Channel coverage | All (biased) | Paid ads only |
| CAPI enrichment | ✗ No | ✓ Native |
| AI recommendations | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Platform bias | Google-favoring | Ad platform-aligned |
| Pricing transparency | Free | Must schedule demo |
Why Cometly Over GA4
GA4 undervalues Meta, TikTok, and non-Google paid channels. Cometly's CAPI enrichment improves Meta match rates from 4.5 to 9.4, giving you much more accurate ad platform data. If paid ads are your primary channel, Cometly tells you more than GA4 can.
Best For
- Paid media-heavy teams (Meta, Google, TikTok)
- E-commerce brands wanting CAPI enrichment
- Teams frustrated with GA4's Google-channel bias
- Non-technical teams wanting AI recommendations
5. Triple Whale — Best for Shopify Stores
Why consider Triple Whale: Dead-simple Shopify attribution that replaces GA4's e-commerce tracking.
Triple Whale vs GA4
| Factor | GA4 | Triple Whale |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | $129-279/mo |
| Shopify integration | Good | Native (app) |
| Setup | Moderate | Minutes |
| AI assistant | ✗ No | ✓ Moby AI |
| E-commerce focus | General | Purpose-built |
| Platform support | Any | Shopify only |
Why Triple Whale Over GA4
For Shopify stores, GA4's e-commerce tracking is clunky to configure and generic. Triple Whale installs as a Shopify app in minutes and gives you Shopify-specific attribution, profit tracking, and an AI assistant (Moby) for natural-language data queries.
Best For
- Shopify stores wanting dead-simple setup
- Non-technical teams who struggle with GA4 configuration
- Teams wanting AI-powered data queries
- Shopify-exclusive businesses
Also consider: Triple Whale alternatives if you need multi-platform support.
6. Northbeam — Best for Enterprise DTC
Why consider Northbeam: ML-powered attribution that prevents the overcounting GA4 can't solve.
Northbeam vs GA4
| Factor | GA4 | Northbeam |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | $400+/mo |
| Attribution approach | DDA (black box) | ML fractional |
| Overcounting prevention | ✗ No | ✓ Sums to 100% |
| Creative analytics | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| MMM capability | ✗ No | ✓ Higher tiers |
| Ad platform partnerships | Google only | Meta, TikTok, Snap, Pinterest |
Why Northbeam Over GA4
GA4 and ad platforms together often claim 190 conversions for 100 actual sales. Northbeam assigns fractional ML credit that sums to exactly 100, solving the overcounting problem that GA4 can't address.
Best For
- Enterprise DTC brands ($40M+)
- Teams with dedicated media buyers
- Creative analytics needs (which ads drive revenue)
- Sophisticated budget optimization
Also consider: Northbeam alternatives for other enterprise DTC options.
7. Rockerbox — Best for Multi-Channel + MMM
Why consider Rockerbox: GA4 can't measure podcasts, TV, or direct mail. Rockerbox can.
Rockerbox vs GA4
| Factor | GA4 | Rockerbox |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | $200/mo (free tier) |
| Podcast tracking | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| TV/CTV tracking | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Direct mail | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| MMM included | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Digital attribution | ✓ (limited) | ✓ Yes |
Why Rockerbox Over GA4
If you invest in awareness channels—podcasts, connected TV, influencer partnerships—GA4 shows you nothing. Rockerbox measures these difficult-to-attribute channels with proxy tracking, surveys, and media mix modeling.
Best For
- Brands with significant awareness channel spend
- CMOs making strategic cross-channel budget decisions
- Podcast, TV, and influencer ROI measurement
- Teams wanting MMM alongside MTA
Also consider: Rockerbox alternatives for other multi-channel options.
How to Choose: Decision Framework
By Budget
| Monthly Budget | Best Options |
|---|---|
| Free | Stick with GA4 + supplement later |
| Under $300 | mbuzz ($29-299/mo) |
| $300-1,000 | Dreamdata ($999/mo), Cometly |
| $1,000+ | HockeyStack ($2,200+/mo), Northbeam ($400+/mo) |
By Use Case
| If You Need... | Best Alternative |
|---|---|
| Multiple attribution models | mbuzz (8 models + custom) |
| LTV / recurring revenue attribution | mbuzz (tracks renewals + upsells to source) |
| Server-side tracking (no ad blocker gaps) | mbuzz (95%+ event capture) |
| B2B SaaS attribution | mbuzz, HockeyStack, Dreamdata |
| E-commerce/DTC attribution | mbuzz, Triple Whale, Cometly, Northbeam |
| Multi-channel including offline | Rockerbox |
| Model transparency + custom rules | mbuzz |
| Unbiased channel measurement | mbuzz, Northbeam |
By Technical Depth
| Technical Level | Best Fit |
|---|---|
| Non-technical | Triple Whale, Cometly |
| Marketing ops | Dreamdata, HockeyStack |
| Technical marketers | mbuzz, Northbeam |
| Enterprise data teams | Northbeam, Rockerbox |
Summary: Best GA4 Attribution Alternatives
| Alternative | Primary Strength | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| mbuzz | 8 models + custom rules, no bias | Free tier, $29-299/mo |
| HockeyStack | All-in-one B2B replacement | $2,200+/mo |
| Dreamdata | B2B with free tier | Free / $999/mo |
| Cometly | Paid ad CAPI enrichment | ~$199/mo |
| Triple Whale | Shopify-native simplicity | $129-279/mo |
| Northbeam | ML-powered, no overcounting | $400+/mo |
| Rockerbox | Podcast/TV/multi-channel + MMM | $200/mo (free tier) |
The bottom line: GA4 is great for web analytics—keep it for that. But GA4's attribution is now a single black-box model that favors Google channels and requires 400+ conversions. If attribution matters to your business, add a dedicated tool alongside GA4.
GA4 removed 5 attribution models. We added 8.
Compare First Touch, Last Touch, Linear, Time Decay, U-Shaped, W-Shaped, Markov Chain, and Shapley Value—side by side. Start free.
Try mbuzz Free →Related Comparisons
- Multi-Touch Attribution Tools Compared — Full market overview
- HockeyStack Alternatives — B2B attribution platforms
- Dreamdata Alternatives — B2B on a budget
- Cometly Alternatives — Beyond paid-ads attribution
Key Takeaways
- ✓GA4 removed first-click, linear, time-decay, and position-based models in 2023—only Data-Driven Attribution remains
- ✓GA4's Data-Driven Attribution requires 400+ conversions and favors Google channels
- ✓Most teams should keep GA4 for web analytics and add a dedicated attribution layer
- ✓Server-side tracking captures 30-40% more data than GA4's client-side approach
- ✓Alternatives range from $29/mo (mbuzz) to $2,200+/mo (HockeyStack) depending on needs
Why look for GA4 attribution alternatives?▼
Should I replace GA4 entirely?▼
What's the cheapest GA4 attribution alternative?▼
Which GA4 alternative is best for B2B?▼
Does GA4's Data-Driven Attribution actually favor Google channels?▼
Ready to try it?
Set up server-side attribution in 10 minutes. Free up to 30K records/month.